As we mentioned in our opening remarks, one of the problems is the duration of the measures provided for in section 810, which is relatively short. Ms. Davis also referred to this problem.
Furthermore, there should be an ongoing risk assessment. When the conditions are not complied with, that is when the harm occurs; the condition has not been complied with. It would be important to have an ongoing risk assessment.
Finally, as I mentioned, legislative changes in that regard are needed, but, when someone fails to comply with their conditions, they should have to demonstrate to the court that they still deserve to be released and not the opposite. In our opinion, the burden of proof should be reversed.
I do not know whether my colleague Ms. Huet would like to add anything.