That's a very good question.
As far as language goes, I don't know, but when it comes to culture, then yes, some references are different. I mentioned in passing that pretty much every community has a nationalist or grassroots antifeminist movement. In Quebec, for example, when women started demanding the right to vote in the early 20th century, the anti-suffragette activists claimed that the suffragettes came from Great Britain, that it was a Protestant idea, that it wasn't Catholic and it wasn't for francophones. They said that it was a foreign concept. It was their way of saying that Quebec women didn't need the right to vote because it was a foreign thing. We see that regularly in many different parts of the world, even within the African-American community in the U.S. in some ways. Black feminists complain that some men in the community say that feminism is a white thing that doesn't concern them, while Black feminists say that African-American feminism does exist.
So yes, there's a reorganization of the antifeminist logic or rhetoric that's related to the historical context, the cultural context and the religious context as well, obviously. The Vatican has its own arguments as to why feminism is problematic. Conservative Jews or conservative Muslims will have other arguments.