I am all for you trying to achieve this balance, but I think that you have focused all your efforts on a management system that, ultimately, requires the industry to use voluntary compliance with regard to safety. You have given some examples, and I want to try to proceed sector by sector.
There has been a railway safety management system in place since 2001, but the number of accidents increased in 2005 and the department took immediate action. However, you have a regular inspection program.
How is it that there were more rail accidents in 2004 and in 2005 if you had an inspection system in place and if, since 2001, the industry was using voluntary compliance? In my opinion, it is because the inspection system was not working. What other explanation could there be?