Yes, but the thing to bear in mind is in those cases where there is a single provider on a route, that provider isn't there because it's mandated to be there. It is a free market here in domestic services, as in all other services, and a carrier is serving the market because it thinks it can do it in a profitable way. Therefore, I don't think it makes a lot of sense to suggest that in the case of complaints a government body can best address those issues.
What would best serve the residents of that small town? I would suggest to you that it would be a healthy and competitive aviation sector, particularly when it comes to small regional carriers. And I think they're the ones that are primarily interested in these cost issues related to airport rents, fuel excise taxes, and security charge, because they're trying to deliver low-cost targeted regional services, but they have to pay the same price, their share, as everybody else does. And if we provided real cost relief, you might actually see more competition, which is the more sustainable way to improve level of services in those kinds of communities.