Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would like to thank you for coming to meet with us.
I would like to address this issue's global approach and a few particular points.
The committee has worked a great deal on the topic of noise because it is a matter of concern for many communities, not so much from corridors, but more from rail yards. I believe you expressed certain reservations about this.
I must wonder about this. I think, for example, that airports are a matter of federal jurisdiction. Between midnight and 6 a.m., there is no air traffic, and I do not believe that that industry is in any danger. Now, as for rail yards, we have noted that more problems have arisen with a company since its privatization.
Lastly, if, as legislators, we impose certain standards, how might this affect the competitiveness of businesses? That is my first point.
The second point is perhaps a broader question for Transport 2000 Canada. I believe your organization has a certain vision. Which is why I would like to hear your remarks on a matter in the bill that is broader and less specific, namely, the Montreal-Toronto corridor.
What do you think of the investments? In your opinion, how much do we need to invest to have a really modern infrastructure? The purpose of this committee is to study infrastructures and transportation. We therefore have a role to play in terms of sustainable development and we must make recommendations to the minister regarding the most beneficial infrastructures, especially concerning passenger transportation. I would like to hear what you have to say about this.
Those are the two points I wanted to address, but I would first like to hear you talk about the rail yards, in particular.