Sorry, but the point I was trying to make earlier in regard to Mr. Julian's 10,000-person cut-off is based on my own personal experience. I spent three years in and out of the Northwest Territories, travelling to places where there are 700 people or 500 people or 1,200 people. The question of access by air, seasonal or otherwise, is a very important question.
What do they say about this? What has the agency or the department done to talk to the dozens of communities across this country that don't live within a four-hour driving proximity or bus proximity of a major airport? How do they get around? How do they get their goods?
You mentioned earlier that there's a positive working relationship with these carriers, these seasonal carriers, anyway with these communities. If that's the case, why wouldn't those carriers not agree with this kind of proposed amendment?