I simply wanted to explain that when I mentioned security, I was referring to the fact that the obligation to regulate is not incumbent upon the governor in council in legislation dealing with safety and security. There is no area that is more important than safety and security. Therefore, if the governor in council is not forced to regulate in an area as important as safety and security, then I don't know why we would do it in this bill.
On December 5th, 2006. See this statement in context.