I would not use “self-regulation”. We believe it is an additional requirement, where we ask the industry to do additional work with us. But it's not delegation, and it's not self-regulation--definitely not--because they currently have to abide by a series of requirements, and we're adding an additional requirement.
In the past, they used to be reactive. They had to comply with regulations. If they did not, we would take enforcement. Now we ask them to do more than comply with regulations; we ask them to become proactive. We ask them to take safety data, analyze them, and come up with trend analyses to determine that if I don't fix this little problem here, it will grow and evolve from a small incident into a bigger incident or accident.
So we ask them to be proactive. We ask them to audit. Even before we go and do our own assessment and audits, we ask them to do an internal one, take the data, and prove to us that they've used that data in a proactive way to advance safety. That's why I'm saying it's much more than it was before. Before it was a set of regulations. Now it's a set of regulations, plus another one asking them to become proactive. So that's why I would not use “self-regulation”.