An all-party agreement, yes. I discuss that in my report.
I have perhaps just one or two more comments, Mr. Chair.
There have been allegations that the port authority was too secretive and that it was not transparent, not making documents and reports available. Indeed, I found they had problems in complying with requirements of the CMA regarding the land use plans and their business plans.
There's no provision--unless there was an amendment in the last six months--in the CMA for the port authority to make an annual report. It doesn't mean that there were no annual meetings, but there was no requirement. They were preparing financial statements. They would call meetings, and they would try to respond to questions. So in this way they were trying to be transparent. But there are no requirements in the act or the letters patent for annual reports.
If there had been an annual report, it would have been an annual report of the Toronto Port Authority, not...the TPA itself. I note in my report that this is a bit of a problem. Having the activities, plans, or objectives of the port nested into the greater whole of the port's information is not the best way to disseminate information about it.
I think I will stop here. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I think you've heard the main points.