I would suggest more auditing, not less, in the case of critical infrastructure, such as bridges. We're in the electronic age today, so how is it that a company can lose its maintenance records on a bridge? How is that? It might be convenient.
First, there should be a system in place where their engineer goes out and does the report. Then within a certain timeframe he has to send it to Transport Canada, and it has to be in their computer. It's all electronic and can be done on the spot, if you want it to be that way. He can do a report right there in his truck at the bridge, and then it can be in Transport Canada's computer.
If it's not there by a specific time, then somebody from Transport Canada should go out to inspect the bridge and bill them for it. They should also be fined: that's accountability.
How does a bridge fall down with a train on it? Sorry, I'm emotional since I've been part of something very awful. I witnessed two of my friends die right in front of me. Why? Because people don't want to hear the truth. People are afraid to talk about the truth, because the truth is going to cost money.
I'm not American, I'm Canadian, and I used to be proud to call my company Canadian National Railroad back in the 1980s. Now I'm not even allowed to do so. I'm supposed to say CNR. What's this?
They're telling us how they're going to run things. I think it's time you guys tell them how it's going to be run.