No, that's the one, the original letter. We spoke about the test case for SMS companies.
I might also point out that we were initially requested by our region to be one of those test cases. We agreed because we felt that if this new regulation was going to be put upon us, we wanted to be part of its implementation and creation.
In the end, upper management decided, for whatever reason, that other companies were more suitable. Yet when we look at the companies that were used as test cases, you will see from our statistics that they are not representative of our industry, which is so large.
We understood from various parties that a very large brief was given to each and every one of you. We have not been privy to that brief, but I'm sure you will have seen it because it seemed to be very big.
It stated that Transport Canada has done years and years of industry consultations through CARAC and these meetings, etc. Our contention is that CARAC is not available to small operators. The meetings are not held in small communities in the north. We are not privy to these kinds of meetings on a normal basis. We don't have budgets to travel at whim to get to these kinds of meetings. We are located from one end of Canada to the other. We're not located in major cities, such as Ottawa, Toronto, or Vancouver.
So when Transport Canada says they have consulted the two largest industries under the Canadian aviation regulations, we beg to differ, because we've shown that they are not consulting us.