When people hear you say “looking at a review”, some would say that begs the question of what direction that review will go. What we've heard most often are musings about the exclusivity, of course. When you look at the financial trend of where you're bringing money in versus operations, and if you give up exclusivity and there's a threat from international mailers, many people--taxpayers, Canadians in general--would be concerned if that were to happen, because then Canada Post would have less revenue base to provide service to Canadians right at the time when we're confronted with issues like rural mail service, which people have discussed fairly thoroughly around this table.
I guess that's more of a comment to say that if you are “looking at things” and you are diminishing revenues while wanting to improve service, something has to give there. If you are reviewing, and assuming the review is taking place or that you're going to initiate a review of the mandate, what kinds of impacts are you looking at? Who are you going to be speaking to in terms of the impact of service? Otherwise, the question is, why have the review? We really need to know what impacts you're looking at beyond the obvious one, which is the bottom-line impact.