Well, sir, of course it's very much public. From our standpoint, we not only acknowledge but also work with, and perceive ourselves to be partners of, hundreds of Canadian Customs and Immigration officers who control entry and exit on the bridge every day of the week. Without them the bridge could not function. We understand that we have to work with many public agencies. But at the bridge's origin and in the original legislation for it in Parliament, in exchange for the private entrepreneur sticking his finances, neck, and reputation on the line to build the bridge, the government granted that company one right—and the right was in perpetuity.
We honour that original legislation and we'd like to keep it that way, and as long as we continue to do a good—and I think the numbers speak for themselves—we'd like to run our business as a private sector business. Do we acknowledge in day-to-day operations that we need to work with government? Absolutely. We couldn't get the job done without them. But as far as the private business nature of the company is concerned, if the government were to live up to that original grant of perpetuity, we shouldn't be infringed on as far as the private sector nature of our business is concerned.