In general, yes. The splitting of the bill was very appreciated. If you look at the other two bills, they are not exact. We have our airline division, our railway conference, and when we move on to others, freight and tank haul, or whatever, it makes it very difficult to come before the House of Commons to make any cogent discussions or arguments, which do we pick and which do we not?
Also, in looking at the bill, our general viewpoint in examining it was that, perhaps more than for other people--let's say, other unions and other groups--the 9/11 world has had a huge impact and continues to have a huge impact on our membership, on the members' ability to work, but also to make sure those vegetables show up in the winter and all those other things that happen. We view this as perhaps one of those required features that has to move forward to continue the assurance that the borders are open.
With that regard, again, the devil is in the detail. As we move forward to the regulatory part, I'm sure we may have other comments.