I'm going to go back to the same question, the question that I haven't had answered yet. If it's such good faith, and it's such a good thing to do, and we're working cooperatively, and we're going to work together to find a solution because we're going to have one on Wednesday, then let's put a time limit on it. I've suggested a 12-hour time limit. I've suggested a two-hour time limit. I've suggested lots of things. I haven't found one good reason why they won't agree to it. If they're acting in good faith, why wouldn't they agree to it?
I would like to read Mr. Volpe's motion, but I'm going to wait until another time, maybe another five minutes or so, because I really want to repeat it twice, as Mr. Julian did a couple of times.
Why will you not agree to a time limit to limit debate?
I will make another amendment, Mr. Chair. Or can I indeed do that?