Okay.
If I am made aware of a maintenance violation by Air CN, and I check with them and it's not internally reported, well, we won't be very forgiving. We'll go straight to the old enforcement process and charge them and prosecute them.
If it is internally reported, now we'll check whether the contravention was committed intentionally by the enterprise. It could be one of those error-based violations. Or it could be obvious--it's a big overloading of an aircraft by 2,000 pounds--and it's obvious that they knew they were doing it. At that time, if we say it was intentional, again we get out of the SMS system and go to the normal enforcement process, and we're very harsh. And I can tell you that we have increased penalties.
If it is not intentional and it was internally reported, we are quite happy, because we know that it is a mature, responsible company that wants to look after business and make sure they fix the problem. So we will work with them to see whether they take corrective measures. If they do take corrective measures, we may agree or not agree with their corrective measures. We may go back and say that it is not enough for us and we need two more. If they give us what we want in terms of satisfaction with the corrective measures, we will carry on.
It asks if the nature of the contravention necessitates the enterprise submitting a plan. If yes, then you go to the enterprise measure requesting that the enterprise submit a plan. You review the plan, and if it's fine, that's the end of the process quality loop. We verify. If we're not satisfied, we take enforcement action again.
This is the SMS system at its best, because we can charge a company. We have all the tools, and we have all the increased penalties for enforcement. If they work well with us and take the proper corrective measures, that is what we want. We want to advance safety. We don't want to just shut down a company and come up with a $100,000 fine if it's not required.