It's not that that would trouble me, Mr. Laframboise, but I know that it would trouble a lot of people at the Department of Justice. That's already permitted under other acts. It would be a precedent. We would not see that kind of thing anywhere else. For that reason, I think it would be redundant. You've previously told me that, when it's redundant, it's strong and therefore better. However, the Department of Justice asks us why provisions should be included in one act when they are already covered by other acts. That topic comes up frequently.
On June 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.