Evidence of meeting #57 for Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was employee.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Franz Reinhardt  Director, Regulatory Services, Civil Aviation, Department of Transport
Susan Stanfield  Legal Counsel, Department of Transport
John Christopher  Committee Researcher
Merlin Preuss  Director General, Civil Aviation, Department of Transport

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Mr. Julian.

5:05 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Mr. Chair, I think if we stood NDP-8.1, we should come back to amendment NDP-8.1.

5:05 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Fast Conservative Abbotsford, BC

Mr. Chair, Mr. Bélanger just made his motion.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

It was a suggestion. It wasn't a motion, as I understood it.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

We can stand NDP-8.1 until we deal with article 2, or section 2, or whatever, and carry on.

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Mr. Julian.

5:05 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Mr. Chair, are you now moving to NDP-8.1? Is that your intention?

5:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

That's correct. It's amendment NDP-8.1.

It says page 44 on the list, but it's apparently not correct. It's on page 39. It's clause 12, line 29, on page 11, replacing line 29 with the proposal.

Mr. Julian.

5:05 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

I move this amendment, Mr. Chair. This is for designated organizations.

Mr. Bélanger is quite right that we need to come back to clause 2 to have the overall discussion

on the scope of the bill. As regards the designated organizations, they are subject to the Canada Labour Code, to the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, 1992 and the Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board Act.

Essentially, we're simply making sure that designated organizations are covered by those three important pieces of law. It's certainly something that I think all members around this table can agree on.

When there are conflicts, we come back to the issue of to what extent the Labour Code and the other two laws actually carry over. It's only in the case of conflicts. It's certainly not in a general way but in the case of conflicts only.

For the moment, because we're dealing with clause 12, this section deals with designated organizations and making sure they are subject to those three pieces of legislation.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Okay. I gather it's proposed subsection (6) that you're actually dealing with, on page 11, and you're adding line 29.

5:10 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Yes.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Okay.

Mr. Bélanger.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

I'll pass.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Mr. Laframboise.

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Laframboise Bloc Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, QC

I want us to understand each other. I understand, Peter, but if we want to adopt amendment LIB-2, the act is clearly subject to the Canada Labour Code. I think we're resolving everything. I know that it doesn't hurt to be extra careful. That's why we're adding the Canada Labour Code, but repeating it 20 times is too much. I agree with you.

As regards the other two acts, I would like us to vote on them one by one and to start with the Canada Labour Code. If we agree, that's perfect, but if we don't agree on the others, then that's the way it is. I don't want to engage in needless debate, but I am opposed to Julian's motion because amendment LIB-2 covers everything.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Is there any other discussion?

(Amendment negatived)

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Now, at this point, do you want to discuss item 2? We had pushed down BQ-22 and NDP-12.1.1. That's page 64. That's Mr. Laframboise's amendment.

5:10 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Laframboise Bloc Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel, QC

Could we move on to amendment LIB-2 immediately, in view of the fact that we have come to it?

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

But we're still on clause 12 at this point.

If you want, we can stand clause 12 where we are and go back to clause 2 and deal with that, and that may facilitate some of the further discussion.

Is there agreement?

5:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

(Clause 12 allowed to stand)

(On clause 2)

Okay, it's done. We'll go back to clause 2.

Mr. Bélanger.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

I move that the amendment concerning section 3.2—

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

We're dealing with amendment BQ-6, I presume, at that point, which was moved.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

It might be useful to take them in reverse order—I think everyone is sort of agreeable to that—amendment Lib-2 and then the others.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Vice-Chair Liberal Don Bell

Well, amendment BQ-6 was moved already.