With all due respect, if it's not triggered by individuals and the toll later has adverse consequences for the community that aren't anticipated, then where is that role? I fail to see how they could be left out of this, when you have operators that are included, and this is consultation.
I've had a number of different things ruled out of order here, but this is consultation again. How can you suggest that the owners or operators, as well as the minister, are going to have the best knowledge exclusively of this, when you actually have professionals who are working locally on a regular, day-to-day basis to actually mitigate traffic in their community?
I don't understand how it wouldn't be a good thing, because if it isn't by the prompting of citizen groups—who apparently have to fight their way into the process again on legislation to actually get some type of representation, as opposed to being included in the legislation—I don't find it acceptable.