This reminds me of the Income Tax Act and how well that's going, with people coming along--lawyers primarily--and finding loopholes. I think that's the situation. You're limiting the minister; you're limiting the ability of the Canadian government to decide who owns the bridges.
What if a foreign power that we're not friendly with comes in and wants to own the bridges? What if somebody wants to own all the bridges and force the price of transfers to go up? There are just so many things. By setting that down, we need to take into consideration that for these important bridges and tunnels, for these passageways for I think 50% to 60% of our economy, we need to have it as wide open as possible so that we can make decisions as a government that are in the best interest of Canadians. The governor in council has to make the decisions in the best interest of Canadians; that's what it's there for.
I just think by limiting it, it's sort of what we're doing with the Income Tax Act. We're inviting the possibility of people finding loopholes that are not to our benefit.