Pursuing that same line of questioning, one of the problems in the past that I've heard identified is that some shippers feel they have been, for want of a better term, bullied by some of the railways and that there is a risk in complaining.
There is the ability to group together both in terms of sharing legal costs and for protection, if you want to call it that, so that it isn't just one person being singled out. If these have to be matters common to all of the shippers, that fact reduces to some degree their ability to share costs. I'm thinking of commercial associations in the past that will group together, where one may not be affected as much as another, but they group together to share the costs, because the next time they'll seek the support of the others in another way.
As long as there's an agreement that it applies to all of them and that there is some thread of legitimacy in terms of application, as opposed.... I can see this becoming bureaucratic.
You say on page 5 of your presentation, Mr. Minister, that it's a new concept and undoubtedly will be subject to challenges as the parties seek to clarify, and that we have to rely on the good judgment of the agency. I guess the issue will be that if problems persist, we may have to adjust the legislation to provide direction to the agency as to what is intended by Parliament.