The reason I asked that—I wasn't trying to be cute—was it's just that in my experience in Parliament, I don't want to say it's a unique situation but it certainly is rare for a bill to come forward that would satisfy almost completely one position that's advanced for any kind of change. I've not seen it. It has probably happened, but I haven't seen it. And I wondered, when I looked at the list of members, these are not small organizations, they're not prone to being bullied, they're quite capable of handling themselves, and yet the language that we've used and we've heard the minister use and we've even heard others use is that—not to put too fine a point on it—it would appear that the railways, the transport measures or mechanisms, are engaging in predatory practices against people who don't look like they are weak prey. Like all parliamentarians, we want to strike a balance. We want to see what's happening here.
While I already accepted that there has to be a balance, I felt I needed to at least express that view. If I had some of the farmers, the local producers, coming forward and saying that they are at the mercy of anybody who wants to take their product.... That doesn't seem to be the case, though.