And one that you represent very well, Ms. Morgan. My second question is for you, because people in forestry in Quebec told me that you were their representative. And I am pleased with that.
The railway companies would have preferred, among other things, an amendment to proposed clause 120.1, because they find it abusive, to use their term. That clause reads as follows:
120.1 (1) If, on complaint in writing to the Agency by a shipper who is subject to any charges and associated terms and conditions for the movement of traffic or for the provision of incidental services that are found in a tariff that applies to more than one shipper other than a tariff referred to in subsection 165(3) [...]
They felt that amendment was too broad, not clear enough. They would have preferred seeing it not apply to incidental tariffs, as they told us.
So I would like you to explain all of these types of tariffs, because I am under the impression they did not tell us the whole story.