I think you're overlooking the point I tried to make. They are subject to a number of regulations and laws under the Canada Shipping Act. Their insurance companies also impose on them a number of fairly strict safety protocols in order for their insurance to be renewed. They have a vested interest in not having accidents.
One of the operators may have mentioned to you last week during his appearance that he takes 30,000 people a year on his river operation, and on average he expects to have maybe one broken leg every two years. He also owns a ski operation, and that ski operation typically has a broken bone of some kind on almost a weekly basis.
The point we're trying to make is that there is some intrinsic risk to riding these rapids, and so on. But when you look at the number of claims and the incidence of injury, they're lower than in alpine skiing. We have to balance this between the viability of this business and the fact that it's not making the kinds of claims that would suggest it's an inordinately risky activity.