Not really. It all depends on what will happen to the private properties. But I don't see any.... On the contrary, we have supported this bill since it was written. We've said so to the NCC, we've said so to the government, we've said so to several of you around the table. I think our brief clearly established that we are supportive, with the one exception that my two colleagues have mentioned, that we need to conserve the property rights as they are established.
You should also understand that there is a good portion of that park--17% or 18%--that the Government of Quebec still considers as the property of the Quebec government. So in the development of that bill, I hope that the chair will also have the wisdom to sit down with the Government of Quebec and ask them how they feel about the whole evolution of this file so that we make sure that all three levels of government work together on the future of that. As I've mentioned, we signed a protocol last year with the NCC that clearly talks about the same issues that are in there.
It is an issue of promoting an awareness of the environment; of ensuring better cooperation in the planning and management of the environment for habitats and species; of increasing the participation of the various partners in this environment; of improving the quality of life of the residents in the region and of sharing the data and information so that we have a better common understanding. These are objectives that we set for ourselves working from the NCC plan, but they also reflect Bill C-37 very well.