Could I answer?
I'd like to say that you can have a national park. Parks Canada has decided in its criteria not to have private homes, but the national parks of Quebec have them—“national” being the international union's definition of national parks: category two parks. There are criteria, and the national parks of Quebec belong to this IUCN definition, and there are homes.
I don't want to spend $380 million to buy homes. I find it absolutely crazy to do so. But you can create a park that has the status of park, and the people who live in the park still own their property and can give it to their children, but they can't subdivide.
So there are ways of doing it; it's not all black and white. And I think there are ways to explore this. The park needs a status so that more houses are not built, but it doesn't mean you have to buy out everybody who's there.