That's one solution. There is no single solution; there are various ways of doing it. I'm sure we could find other examples.
As I've already said, there are still farmers in Plaisance National Park, and there are agreements. I don't believe that has to be black and white. It seems to me there is a way of reaching an agreement, of sitting down with people and seeing what the best solution is. The houses represent 2% of the area of the park. I believe there are roads, that the houses have gardens and dogs and that they have an impact on more than 2% of the territory. However, the first thing is to sit down, talk it out and see what the best solution is. For the moment, we're talking amongst ourselves, but the people who live in the park and the NCC aren't here. I'll always be in favour of joint action and dialogue. We can come up with solutions.