Yes. You know there is quite a difference here, actually, and I'm glad Mr. Volpe pointed it out, because it's something that fits well with what I'm trying to get across, which is that this amendment speaks to the transportation security clearances, which have the ability to impact on the rights of Canadians. Therefore, it's probably a good idea to review those regulations in front of Parliament prior to their implementation.
Mr. Volpe's amendment is a good amendment, and it covers everything after it's implemented. So after the fact, and that's quite clear, made under this act, with a written complaint or by its own initiative, it can bring back these regulations for review after they have been in place.
So on the one hand, we have an issue that is more of a charter issue, which ties to the rights of Canadians to privacy, which should be very carefully examined prior to issuing the law. On the other hand, we have regulations, which need time in the field to ensure they are correct or not correct. So these are two quite different things, and that's why I think they both stand very well. And I would encourage Mr. Volpe, along with everyone else, to see that we can live with both of these within the bill.