I would like some indication. I just noticed something. Quite frankly, I can't believe amendment LIB-2 would be in order. I think it's ultra vires. It's beyond the minister's power, I would think, in this circumstance. I don't know if I'm correct or not, but the NCC has jurisdiction over all of the lands as an arm's-length body. If the NCC has jurisdiction for the NCC and they are asking for the minister to be responsible for the construction and maintenance of the monument, I would see that as a conflict of laws. As a result of that, it would not be in order. I would like some indication of that.
All the sitting members here have had experience with the NCC, with the act itself. We've been here. We've gone through the act. The NCC--the commission--is responsible for the commission. Are they suggesting that the minister is going to be responsible for this one particular monument, which I think is beyond his jurisdiction?
I've just received word from a little birdie on my shoulder that the minister is not actually allowed to make any orders for a crown corporation, so I think this particular Liberal amendment is beyond jurisdiction.