Before we have any further discussion, I would again rule that the proposed amendment is substantive and therefore inadmissible.
Mr. Jean.
On June 3rd, 2010. See this statement in context.
June 3rd, 2010 / 3:50 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed
Before we have any further discussion, I would again rule that the proposed amendment is substantive and therefore inadmissible.
Mr. Jean.
See context to find out what was said next.