Certainly, our members discussed that extensively in December 2008 and January 2009, before the stimulus funds were announced. Even at that time, most of our members understood that it would be difficult to undertake legacy projects if the government's intention for this program was to focus mainly on creating jobs. Of course, that was a government decision.
Our members are here. We have a range of needs, from rehabilitation of existing infrastructure to the creation of new legacy projects, as you described. They were certainly willing to work with the government of the day to complete projects that were consistent with meeting national objectives, like job creation, but you're right, there were other projects that were available. It really was up to the government to decide what the objectives of that program were.