Mr. Chair, I'm somewhat surprised by amendment G-6. We're talking of “maintenance”, and that's fine, but we're also talking of “restoration of the ecological integrity”. When we had witnesses here from the National Capital Commission, one of their apprehensions, if I may call it that, was that they might end up having to restore ecological integrity, because Gatineau Park and the greenbelt are so huge in territory that it would be impossible to attain a level of restoration.
I am shocked that the government would propose this sort of amendment. I am not sure whether there was a breakdown of communication between the Department of Transport and the National Capital Commission.
To alleviate the problem, or rather to solve the problem, I want to suggest using the wording from our amendment, LIB-7, as a subamendment to amendment G-6. Furthermore, that kind of subamendment to amendment G-6 would be in line with the decisions we have made to date, especially the decision to include the Greenbelt in these discussions. Amendment G-6 refers to the management of any property of the National Capital Commission located in Gatineau Park, but not to the management of such property located in the Greenbelt.
If we could propose amendment LIB-7 as a subamendment to amendment G-6, I think that would make it a lot more acceptable.