One of the things that I struggle with is the notion of the grassroots of what privacy is all about. It's a fundamental protection. Also, I recognize the fact that in the absence of a convention of procedures, let's take a situation where there's not a no-fly list, there is no pre-screening before a Canadian traveller or an international traveller gets on board. A Canadian citizen goes to not only Washington but, say, goes to Jamaica or some other jurisdiction without any pre-board screening, and then finds themselves in the jurisdiction of Cuba, or Jamaica, or wherever, and then finds out that they're not eligible to fly home because the Jamaican authorities decide they're not eligible.
Wouldn't it be better to actually have the screening done in advance and have a procedure in place? Wouldn't you agree with that? Or is it better for a Canadian citizen to be in a foreign jurisdiction with, all of a sudden, their rights stripped from them?