I was just going to respond to something Mr. Dhaliwal said. If what he's saying is that it makes sense to be able to not fly over the U.S., then I think he's right, because the difficulty is that if we don't adhere to U.S. law, we're not going to be flying over the U.S. It's clearly indicated by the officials that if we don't, it's likely that they won't allow us to do so. If we adopt this amendment, then we're not going to be able to. From one side, I understand, as I think Mr. Bevington said, that what we should provide to them in this law is only what U.S. law requires. Is that what you were saying, Mr. Bevington?
On December 2nd, 2010. See this statement in context.