I'm glad to see you guys are carrying on the humour. Good. Merci beaucoup.
I even talked to Mr. McCallum about this particular motion--listening to the cab drivers--and I'm not even sure if everybody knew what motion we were talking about.
Ultimately the chair was overturned on a decision he made on the basis of a legal precedent that this is before a court—that's what I understood it to be—and as a result of it being before a court, he didn't want to prejudice it. That seems to make a lot of sense to me.
I didn't want to challenge the chair before we discussed it because I didn't understand the situation. I wanted to know what the situation was. And nobody, even to this time, has told me what the situation is. Maybe we could find that out.