I guess the point is that there's a fair amount of federal money going to the municipality.
That leads to the question of the polling you did--which I find interesting--showing that mobility was the number one issue, above education and health care, until you took education and health care away, and then all of a sudden it would change.... Nonetheless, it's very valid in that polling.
The question is, when you're looking at a long-term strategy--and this gets back to a long-term strategy in transit--did you, in the poll, ask the question whether, if it was their number one issue, it was enough of a number one interest for them to be able to support it financially as well?