Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
My question is for Ms. Cobden.
You proposed three amendments. You said earlier you had listed them in order of your priorities, but the one I am interested in is the third one. It calls for a new stand-alone section that would define adequate and suitable accommodation, and service obligations.
You said that if those terms are not clearly spelled out in the legislation, the use of market power by the railways, or the legal process through arbitration, could erode these already agreed to definitions.
I think that's a very wise idea and would make a worthwhile addition to the bill.
Could you enlighten us all and tell us in real terms what could happen if those definitions are not included in the bill?