Yes. It ties a bit into the question you asked Ian. We placed them there in the order they appear in the bill. Many of them are inextricably linked to one another.
When we started this process, under a very short timeline, at the Coalition of Rail Shippers we had over 30. We said this wasn't going to work; we needed to pare it down to the minimum we needed to get at the stated objectives of the bill.
I think that if you're looking at removing some of the amendments or not making the amendments now, it really does shift us into a grey area. A number of them get at making sure that the service pie increases in size. If we don't put those measures in place to plug those holes, we don't know if the pie is going to increase in size.
It's going to be divided differently, though. When you ask a group of shippers whether we would be better off to have it or not, it really depends on where you feel you sit in the marketplace and whether you're going to end up with a larger-sized pie or a smaller-sized pie. I think you'll end up with a group of shippers that would say we need these amendments with this bill. You'll end up with another group of shippers that would say, let's take this now and fight hard for the rest of them later. It really puts us into a grey area if we're without these amendments.