Mr. Langlois, when you were having this dialogue with all the parties as you were putting together your thoughts towards the bill—and I'm not sure if it was you directly or your colleagues at the table within your department—clearly you weren't moved, then, by the shippers' position as it relates to the reference to “operational”. Why was that?
If I recall the clauses, and I do recall them, the word “operational” was I think in every one of them, maybe save one. It was really the issue that the shippers have hung on. That seemed to be their raison d'être with the amendments, but you weren't moved by that to suggest that you wanted to include it in the legislation. Why is that?