We do not want to give you the impression that we are opposed to P3 projects. We are not; we support them. However, in order for them to happen, as the term suggests, there has to be a partnership. There has to be some interest, and often, you are right, it is possible. There would still have to be an assessment of whether that was more efficient in terms of the investment, the times, the construction costs, and so on. As I said earlier, it has not been a success in Quebec. There have been some with the Quebec ministère des Transports, but there have been no P3 projects with the municipalities.
However, we are open to it and I think it is an avenue worth considering. But I would not say it is going to solve all the cost problems, because an assessment would have to be done.
For example, I would not want to see a public-private partnership for drinking water because, in my opinion, drinking water is a matter of people's health. I am not saying that when it comes to drinking water, businesses would not be careful, but some projects, in my opinion, have to remain the responsibility of the municipalities. We support P3s, but we do not have any projects we can present to you today in that regard. We could perhaps initiate a discussion concerning projects that we would like to do as P3s. That remains to be seen.