No, I understand your point. I mean it would be one thing if you could make the case that our employees are paid a lot less, below minimum wage, are somewhat unsafe, or whatever—none of which can be claimed. I can only speak for companies that are Merit members. As I said, they have full health and dental benefits, all the same benefits that closed shops have. So there's no distinction.
It's a false analogy, and I often get this when I'm at committee on other topics. It's a way to talk down about our members and their employees and how we treat them. It's just not borne out by the facts.