Obviously, we would want to be doing our homework. In looking at ratifying a convention, we're going to be looking at whether it has adequate coverage, and that has been ascertained at this point.
If we're talking about never having a cleanup that is greater than $200 million, we can talk about how that's in the past and we want to look forward, and we all should look forward. We also have a number that cannot necessarily be pinned down forever. That number can be adjusted over time if need be, just as you said that the ship-source oil pollution fund could be adjusted if need be.
What we're looking at is whether it's adequate at today's levels. I get the sense that if your organization strongly supported and promoted the HNS convention, you must have had a really good sense that it was adequate funding, or why would you have continued to support it?