No. The current regulation requires that every dangerous good that is transported needs to be tested, so that's not true.
The other part of the order, or protective direction, does state that if the product has not been tested, it needs to be tested and be put in the highest high-risk means of containment. Basically what we're telling the industry is that if you haven't had the proper testing done, you need to classify it as a higher-risk product and put it in the proper means of containment. We're basically making sure that there is no loophole.