When it was determined, after the Mississauga derailment, that an emergency response assistance plan should be put in place, one of the criteria we identified as a policy decision was ensuring that companies had the expertise and tools when first responders were not equipped to deal with the product interaction or the product consequences of an incident. These were determined to be the ERAPable products. Or the product was determined to require an ERAP because of the type of reaction or the tool or equipment needed.
The perfect example is radioactive material. If there is an incident, then you need proper equipment. That is why it was determined that these types of products needed an ERAP, and the determination was that petroleum crude was not a product that needed an ERAP.
Now we are looking at the new product. There is a working group in place right now to look at whether the requirement should be a part of our regulations.