In terms of the bill that's before you, it is very similar if not identical to the key features of the legislation that enabled the transfer of the assets out to Nav Canada. There are a few small differences around the charging principles and those sorts of things, but by and large it's very much the same.
Some of the concerns that I think existed at the time of the privatization of Nav Canada—the inadequacy of funding, the ability to respond on an agile basis to the needs of those who require the services, in this case, security screening or in another case the navigation services—certainly are the same and resonate at that level, yes.