First of all, it goes to the point I made earlier that it's got to be defined up front so that all bidders are aware of what is expected and how they're going to be judged with respect to their tenders. In particular, if the award of the contract is also going to be based on the value of the community benefits being provided as defined in the document, it has to be defined in the document.
In fact, according to Treasury Board policy, any weighted criteria given to anything other than price must also be up front. Is there an additional cost? You'd have to ask PSPC about how much more difficult it is to assess proposals that come in that have conditions other than simply price. Nothing's for free. If a local community wants, in addition to the new federal penitentiary being built in their region, to have an additional green space, and that's provided in the documents that go out to bidders, they will price that provisional green space accordingly. That will be part of the process. I think it's very important to understand that these requirements must be identified up front, particularly if they're going to be part of the selection criteria.