Okay.
We've also talked about some of the vagueness in the bill, certainly in proposed subsection 20.1(2) where the word “may” is used instead of “must” or “shall”. It's also very apparent that we are talking about the construction, maintenance, or repair of Public Works federal real property or federal immovables. We know there are 37,000 federal buildings and 20,100 federal properties. If the Minister of Public Works and Government Services requested the contractor to include the community benefit in each bid proposal, do you think there would be an increased administrative cost to the department? Can you comment on whether or not there would be standard community benefits that might be identified by the department, or would you see it being very fluid and changing from project to project? If there were increased administrative costs, how much would they be?