Of course. The research project had some limitations, obviously. Key among them was that we were looking backwards on projects that had already happened rather than forward on new data or new projects that were coming on board. Certainly, the data we had limited our ability to speculate forward, to think about whether there were any new projects that had come on board that no longer had the navigation piece or would no longer be covered by NPA. If we were to do this project today, we would have two extra years of data that we could actually start to use to see what the implications of NPA specifically have been. However, when we were doing this project, the changes had only just been put in place and implementation had not yet occurred. I can't actually at this point speak to any case in which navigation has been impeded since NPA has been implemented. However, we can say, based on the data we have, that, of the environmental assessments or the projects that were triggered under NWPA, 58% would not be triggered under NPA.
As I said, it may be the case that some of these projects would still see oversight in some capacity or another through either the Environmental Assessment Act or the Fisheries Act or some other piece of legislation, but I think it's also important for us to potentially distinguish between navigation as one interest or one role for government to play versus environmental assessments, which may be looking at a different set of implications.