Thank you.
In the same vein, the 2016 Canadian Infrastructure Report Card says that 62% of large municipalities, 56% of medium-sized municipalities, and 35% of small municipalities reported having formalized asset management plans, more towards the capital side, as well as, I'm sure, during that time frame, looking at lifespan as well as replacement. Those plans include bridges and roads, all the way down to water and sewer and CSO programs, and again, both capital and operational.
To what extent will Infrastructure Canada's work on enhancing municipal capacity in asset management take into account these different and existing asset management capacities? That's question number one.
Question number two, what are some practical ways in which those requirements for formalized asset management plans can be imposed on recipients of federal infrastructure funding?