I can respond to that and clarify a couple of the points.
To be clear, the LHI remedy is designed so that short-line rail carriers are not subject to an LHI order, so if this amendment is aimed at subjecting short-line rail carriers to interswitching or long-haul interswitching provisions, that was a deliberate design of the remedy. Of course, care was taken in designing the LHI remedy so that shippers on short-lines are able to access LHI at the point of connection with the class I railway.
In terms of what provisions apply for the movement of traffic within a 30-kilometre radius, the interswitching provisions will continue to apply.
I hope that addresses your questions.